
我和猫的影子

那天的收成

完工


雨后彩虹

Posted by kk







Posted by kk



Posted by kk




















Posted by kk













Posted by kk






































Posted by kk






























endless zucchini战斗2:zucchini bread,味道也还不错


农药说为虾米超市都是一串串红d,俺们的一个个红捏,后来一想估计超市都素青的就成串摘了,然后催熟?

Posted by kk






































Posted by kk

Posted by kk
Posted by kk
Posted by kk


















Posted by kk















当当很快跑到力尽,丁丁早就停下了,我们都以为丁丁体力不如当当,要知道当当是我们拿跑步机+开车溜练出来的,所以丁丁体力不如当当很正常,但是后来发现我们都错了。。。丁丁真狗不露相。。。人家那叫保存体力,绝对的跑马拉松的料!















顺便说下,肝脏好吃有营养,不过不能给他们吃太多,当treat没问题的,当饭吃就太过了,太肥而且维生素a太多 Posted by kk












Posted by kk
a photo.net interview by Mary Ball; created October 2007
Jeff Ascough has been a professional wedding photographer in the United Kingdom since 1989. He has covered over 1000 weddings with a documentary photography style. Ascough emphasizes capturing the moment without any prompting or interference and using available light. American Photo voted Ascough as one of the ten best wedding photographers in the world.
Ascough was asked questions in the photo.net wedding photography forum, moderated by Mary Ball. Mary Ball edited and reorganized the interview into the article below.
Ascough: Around 1994, about five years into my career as a photographer, I started to be disillusioned by traditional wedding photography. I'm glad I first took a traditional approach, as it taught me a lot about lighting, face position, camera heights etc. However, it seemed to me I was being too intrusive on the wedding day.
Around this time, I switched from Leica rangefinders and bought my first SLR: a Canon EOS 100 and a cheap 28-80 lens. Between the formal images, I took candids, mainly for my own pleasure just to keep my interest going. What surprised me was the client reaction: they loved these informal images. I knew then I was onto something. I could satisfy my own artistic desires and please my clients.
My style is all about anticipation. Compared to others, I capture relatively few images at weddings. I like to see a picture, set the composition and angle relative to the light, and then wait for something to happen within that picture. I may take several frames to get the perfect capture. If something doesn't happen, I go and look for another image. I'm very deliberate and controlled in what I do, most of the time anyway.
If you ever get to see the film War Photographer (2001), with James Nachtwey, the way he photographs is very similar to how I do things. Nachtwey is very deliberate and takes his time over the image. I am drawn to the sheer aesthetic beauty of his images. Forget the content and just look at the use of his composition, the light and his understanding of the decisive moment. Nachtwey is a genius with a camera. In many cases, he has achieved fantastic images while being under intense stress, far more than you or I will ever witness with a camera. That is what is so special about the guy.
I will take several frames of each picture to make sure I nail the decisive moment. Unfortunately, I have to capture several frames with DSLRs as the view finder goes blank at the point of exposure. When I used to photograph with rangefinders, I could see the moment as it happened so my actual frame rate was lower. I position myself for the picture I want to achieve and go for it. I don't move around too much, nor do I blast away with the camera, as this is distracting to the subject.
In my world, sufficient light means enough illumination to get a photograph without too much subject movement. This could be 1/15th sec, f1.2, 3200 ISO for static subjects, or 1/50th sec, f1.2, 3200 ISO for slightly moving subjects. However, the light needs to be good as well.
If I'm completely in a bind, I will use flash to either clean up the light or to freeze movement. However, this is usually a last resort. The flash is always balanced for the background. The only time I've used flash this year (2007) was for the first dance at two weddings. During the summer, I don't use flash at all.
Find the rooms where the wedding will take place and look for the main light source. Get your assistant to move around the light source while you see how the light plays on the person. Look at the angle of light and how it changes as you also move in relation to the light and the person. You will then get a better idea of where to be in relation to the subject to take your pictures at a given time.
Great light and composition are more important to me than anything else in a photograph. Cartier-Bresson, one of my heroes, always looked for the composition first and then waited for the decisive moment. He enjoyed the mathematics of composition. I'm the same. If I can combine great composition, great light, and something interesting within the image, I have the makings of a great picture. I always go for composition and light first.
I follow my clients, looking for the light within the environment they are in. In some cases they may never venture into the best light. That's the way it goes-I won't ever ask them to move into better light as I'm not there to interfere.
If the light was bad, I would capture the image with a wide angle and make the subjects very small in the frame, allowing the rest of the frame to tell the story. That way the client would get their processional image, which would look great, and you wouldn't have to worry too much about the light on their faces.
|
Regarding exposure and backlighting: I tend to overexpose by 1-2 stops to get detail in the faces. I then run my 'highlight paramedic' action to bring back detail in the highlights. |
|
Similar lighting outdoors. |
|
Side lighting with the bride's dress acting as a reflector. |
|
3/4 lighting. As above but with the bride's face at 45 degrees to the light. |
|
Good old tungsten light at the reception. |
|
Tungsten light at the reception used as a backlight. |
|
Bright sunlight outdoors--light reflected off the building behind me to light the bride's face. |
|
Bright sunlight used as a spotlight in church. |
|
As you can see, good light gives a great three-dimensional quality to an image. It can be hard, soft, or angular. As long as it lifts the image I'm happy. |
|
Poor shadowy lighting. Some dodging has been done in Photoshop to lighten the bride's face. The eyes are still quite dark, but the expression and my relative distance from the subject allows me to get away with it. |
|
Really strong full sun. This photograph wasn't possible when the bride looked up, so I waited until she looked down, in order that the poor light doesn't affect her face negatively. |
|
Full sun again. This time I've included a lot of the environment in order to 'hide' the poor lighting on their faces. |
The two things you have to consider when photographing in dim light are your focus and your shutter speed. Focus is fine as long as you can confirm it, and the camera has some help. To this end, I use a Canon EC-A microprism screen in all my cameras. It allows me to judge whether or not the subject is sharp in low light. It also allows me to manually focus if necessary. In really low light, I use a Canon STE2 Speedlite Transmitter on its own. This throws out a beam of light that helps the camera to focus. I don't try to photograph subjects that are moving about in dim light. That is the domain of the flashgun. If I can get a shutter speed of 1/30th, I'm ok. I can handhold a 35mm down to 1/8th sec without issue, but there will always be subject movement.
I always squeeze off three frames at a time. I can guarantee the second one will be sharper as I relax momentarily.
|
85mm, f1.2, 1/40, ISO 1600. It has a little softness to it, but I think that is part of the charm. I'm braced against a wall, and this was the third image in a continuous capture sequence. The B&W is done via my actions. |
|
Some really, really strong backlighting. The rim light is fine on the groom's face. I had to wait for the expression from the bride. However, the lighting isn't the greatest on her face. By including more of the environment, I've hidden the poor light on her face. The expression more than makes up for it. |
I don't own any lighting equipment other than a Canon Speedlite 580EX II Flash (review) and a beat-up Canon 550EX (discontinued model). I certainly wouldn't be interested in bringing out any sort of large light modifier just to do two or three formal shots.
I wouldn't photograph formals in any place where I couldn't control the light. If the ceiling is too high or dark, I would move the couple to an area with a lower, whiter ceiling, even if it means sacrificing a slightly better background. If I have to do formal portraits in a high-ceiling environment and I need to use flash, I'll flip out the white diffuser on the top of the Canon Speedlite 580EX II Flash (review), angle the flash head upright, and bounce into that.
Digital has allowed me to make my product better. I have total control over everything now, something film never allowed me to do. However, my product is exactly the same as it was when I used film, just more refined and true to my own vision. Digital cameras allow more artistic expression through post processing, far more than film ever did. Photographers doing something unique with post processing will inevitably be copied, and then the post processing becomes a style. This is what is happening now.
My White Balance (WB) is preset to daylight. I leave it on that all day unless I am in tungsten light. Then I'll switch it over to tungsten or do a custom WB if I get the time. Since Photoshop CS3 and Aperture 4 have arrived, I could photograph an entire day using Auto White Balance (AWB) and do the WB correction later in the software.
Regarding actual pictures, I take around 300 composed images. This translates to anywhere between 1000 and 1200 actual presses of the shutter, given that I take 2-4 images in continuous capture mode for each composition. All finished files and original images are backed up to external drives. All finished JPEGs are backed up to Gold CDs.
My Canon EOS-1D Mark II N (review) is set to neutral and the contrast is backed off by one click. The images come out of camera pretty flat. I use one of my actions to boost the color and contrast. Most people use curves to do this but I find it blocks up the shadows too easily. My actions are set so the shadows don't block up.
I like my color images to look like film: my colors should be real as I'm documenting reality. I'm not into heavily saturated colors or too much contrast. I also like my flesh tones to be on the warm side, so I usually boost the WB a little to get this. I retouch blemishes in closeups only. I do a fair amount of work through actions on each image though. This is to emphasize different parts of the image rather than trying to polish it. In the future, as RAW software becomes better at skin tones, and camera resolutions become greater with better highlight detail, there will be more emphasis on subtlety and true color rather than the heavily saturated stuff that we see now.
Many photographers claim that photographing RAW actually speeds up workflow. I've always found the opposite. However, while browsing one of my favorite web sites, www.digitaljournalist.org, I came across an article on how photographing in JPEG actually makes you a better RAW photographer. In theory, JPEG photographers tend to get it right in camera. If they carried over their photographic technique to RAW, the images straight out of camera should require very little manipulation in the RAW software and should be ready to be converted to JPEG without messing too much with the files. The advantage here is that less time is spent adjusting JPEGs in Photoshop. I am constantly trying to improve this major area of my workflow.
To make RAW work for me, it needs to significantly cut down the time I spend tweaking JPEGs in Photoshop. Aperture and Lightroom don't do that. I need an application that will give me the quality that I want, especially in the realm of skin tones, with absolutely minimal work required afterwards in Photoshop. Then I could take this RAW thing seriously as a solid workflow option.
I think I have found the answer: Capture One Pro. I had completely overlooked this program because of its price tag and its unique workflow. The user interface took some getting used to, but it does make sense. The noise reduction is excellent. High ISO images have never looked so good. I haven't gotten into the different profiles yet, but the black & white options look interesting.
The last three weddings I've captured in RAW and processed the images in Capture One Pro. I am delighted with the results. The colors straight out of the camera and into the software are beautiful. The files generally only need a quick contrast/exposure tweak and they are done. This is saving me so much time as I don't have to then load the images into Photoshop to process the images. I'm impressed.
Could this be the start of a new beautiful relationship? It's too early to tell. I am still learning about the software, but I have to say it's so far-so good. I'm still not convinced that the quality from Capture One Pro is better than from my JPEG workflow, but it's not taking as long to process my images. I'm sure the technical quality will improve as I get used to the software.
Usually, I have a 24-70 on my Canon EOS 1D Mark II N and a fast prime, most often a 50L on the backup body, same model. In the pouch, I have a 35L and sometimes an 85L. That's pretty much it for how I work. If I need to carry more lenses, I use a small satchel-type bag. My current bag of choice is the Lowepro Rolling Mini Trekker AW. I try not to work while wearing it, though, as it puts pressure on my back. For my spare kit, which lives in the car, I use a Lowepro Compact AW.
During the summer, I'll ditch all the primes and just use one body with a 24-70. That's my most preferred way of working, but I need a good sunny day to do that.
For more information regarding Ascough's cameras and lenses, please view his equipment page.
I love B&W images. It's what drew me to photography in the first place. Photography to me is all about light, shape and form: B&W allows you to strip away the distraction of color and get right to the heart of the image. With that in mind, I capture most of my images knowing they will end up being B&W. I rarely try a B&W conversion out on an image just to see what it will look like; I pretty much know which images will be B&W even before I've downloaded the cards.
Album design is my sole responsibility. Clients don't have any input into it. It's part of the service we provide. I use Jorgensen Album Designer Software and Yervant's Page Gallery 4 for designing the albums. My albums are Jorgensen exclusively. The number of pages and album shape/design varies according to client's taste.
Some people have objected to having a completed album, but in all honesty they are very few and far between. Once I explain my philosophy behind my approach, they are quite happy with it. I photograph for the album, not to sell pictures after the event. The album is the vehicle for my work and I capture images accordingly. It makes a difference to me as an artist to have that freedom, without having to work within the constraints of taking pictures, which I have to sell afterwards.
The clients get their albums within six weeks of the wedding and they don't need to visit me, choose pictures, or even have to contact me again. With my clients' busy lifestyles, most of them appreciate this hassle-free approach.
If you proof your images, you are saying to the client, "I can't decide which are the best pictures from your wedding. I'm going to let you decide even though you don't have any experience looking at wedding photographs." Furthermore, if a client has to choose a set number of images, how will she do it? She'll look out for the pictures she doesn't like, implying that there are pictures in the set that aren't very good. In my opinion, that's too negative a standpoint to take. I would rather present my clients with an album compilation of only the best images.
We have a Skooks Shopping Kart available on my web site for clients to see their wedding pictures while the album is being made. It also allows guests to order prints after the wedding.
Also important is a relationship with a good lab: I have a good lab. We are fully color-managed and use the lab's recommended color space. The lab's printing profile is assigned to the images. My actions also ensure there is no color cast in the images before we send them to the lab. The prints we get are perfectly neutral and consistent over the whole wedding.
My formals are very simple. They are very quick to do and the clients appreciate that.
I tend to turn up to a gig with no preconceived ideas of how things will happen, or which images will materialize. If I do a few formals, I limit it to six photographs and that limit is clearly stated on my web site. I focus on capturing what happens in front of me, documentary-style. If I had to refer to a list of "must-have" images, my natural reaction would be to focus on completing the list, and that would hinder me as a photographer. My clients are aware of this when they book me.
Of course, I always get the key moments of *their* day, often different from the key moments many photographers think they should photograph. There are plenty of examples of illustrative images on my web site.
The best thing to do is to practice with a model. Take images in different lighting conditions and see which give you the best images. That's how I started out. You should be looking for how the light molds the subject. Sometimes it's best to squint when looking at the light as this gives you a better indication of the light direction.
One of the differences that separates the talented pros from the rest in photography, is the photographer's ability to see light direction and quality. Try to second-guess what is going to happen. It might sound weird, but I have almost a sixth sense when it comes to photographing. I can see the image in my mind's eye before it happens. I suspect this is a result of many years of experience, though, rather than any special ability.
I know how and when to position myself for an image even before I bring the camera up to my eye. Once I'm looking through the view finder, I refine the framing and decide on what to leave in and what to leave out of the image. I then wait for the desired moment to happen. If all hell is breaking loose around me, e.g., the dancing at the reception, I'll go with my instincts and react to things happening. This manner of photographing is more haphazard though, and my success rate is a lot lower.
It's important to be as unobtrusive while photographing weddings. That said, you can be unobtrusive while less than three feet from the subject. It's all about how you behave when photographing. If you permanently have a camera up to your eye, firing off hundreds of images, the client is going to be very aware of you. Also, hiding in the shadows can be more intrusive than standing close to your subject, because odd behavior is noticeable. If you simply have the camera down at your side and just quietly observe, they will relax and start to ignore you.
Unobtrusiveness doesn't mean you can't be seen. That's a mistake many people make. For many clients, unobtrusiveness means that you are letting them get on with their special day without making them stop for photographs.
The Main Wedding Kit
The Backup Kit
Posted by kk

























































Posted by kk




树林























































Posted by kk











Posted by kk

































Posted by kk
到了内布拉斯加
路上实在太无聊了。。。自拍解闷
狂睡的当当
偷拍被发现
继续睡
中部大平原没啥别的,就是牛多,所以不在这吃吃牛排也过不去了,今天除了开车没别的玩头,所以在高速边上某town找个牛排的大吃一顿再上路~~
才重新上路就看到这个桥,还挺好看的
日落了,一整天没拍啥正经东西,怪无聊的,找个出口下来看日落
晚上到了lincoln,掐一张
夜宿omaha,正好在NE的这边,这样明早起来上路还能拍iowa welcome you那样的牌子,距离我的旅行不过区区2个月,怎么也没想到2个月后,这我看起来平的一塌糊涂应该很安全的区域居然遭受水灾,真是难以想象啊。。。今年实在不是什么好年份。。。Posted by kk
走在前往rocky的路上
才进公园,就看到了鹿屁股,当然也有鹿头鹿脑,哈哈,好多哦~
根据aspen的经验,我也不指望这个季节rocky能看到什么了,果然,公园西部都关闭了,我们过不去,很多trail也都是雪,不过,既然做了再来的决定,也没啥好难过的了,看看这个季节的雪山也不错~
挺拔的树
3狗成行
sprague lake
风吹过,雪山雪飞起
到了传说中的熊湖,本来想走那条必走的trail的,发现一片雪,人家都是穿着滑雪长鞋在走trail,我们一行。。。寒一下。。。
雪很深,有些窟窿感觉深不见底
石头上还是有青苔的
狼人
到的这个湖不知道是哪个,可能是nymph lake,还不到dream lake
白白的雪,很适合玩耍,某人又要搞怪了~嘻嘻
回程时候的搞怪,滑雪
离开熊湖那圈,我们就离开了,不得不说,冬天可看的东西还是不多的,真没想到这儿开春这么晚,我们离开az的时候,夏天都开始了呢~


Posted by kk
从glenwood spring一路向南,一路看到雪山,可惜的是,我向往的independace pass因雪关闭了,这个地方被人说的是,车技不好的就不要去了,我和农药都非常好奇,所谓车技不好是怎么个不好?出门到现在,我们已经非常确信,只有是美国州路以上的公路根本没啥大不了的,我们拖着大胖,什么路上都开过来了,东边可比西边好开多了。。。当然俺家农药的车技也是不错的,嘿嘿
到了著名的雪山景区,我又傻了,车子开到半道开不进去了,后半截路根本没有扫雪。。。变成cross country的滑雪道了。。
我家当当第一次见雪吧?好像也不怕
连续受了2次打击,我对aspen已经没啥兴趣了,这个地方反正还要再来玩的,何必在这样萧条的季节来看?于是,我们就在town里随便转了转,这季节,我们又玩了这许多天,累坏了,不如快快回glenwood spring泡温泉,这里的温泉可是有名的呢~~
aspen真的是很小的小镇,几条街就到了头
著名的音乐中心,夏天会有音乐节的
返回glenwood的路上,我开始期待温泉,温泉是露天的,和我想象的不太一样,感觉是大游泳池,池子有2个,小的那个水温更高些~
一路上的奇石怪山
这样利用空间真的很强呢,上下双层的高速
一路飞驰过去。。。。过了洛基,denver很快就在眼前了
到此,我们的旅行进行了整一半了,正好休整一下。
Posted by kk
居然看到一条巨大的鱼,好想捞起来吃掉啊~~
帆船
旋转木马
鸟儿们

Posted by kk
















































Posted by kk
















































Posted by kk
这是上个月的事儿了,农药从邻居家回来,说,看到一窝鸟蛋,居然是tiffany的颜色的,我说,那就是蓝色知更鸟的吧,tiffany不就是根据这个选的颜色么。还没来得及找时间去邻居家拍鸟蛋,就看到了鸟宝宝~
鸟宝宝在我家前院蹦














现在一个月过去了,鸟宝宝们早长大了,天天叽叽喳喳吵的不得了。。。。。。
===========
更正,这个蓝鸟是blue jay,不是知更鸟。。。。
因为有tiffany颜色的蛋,而这个鸟又是唯一的蓝鸟,我才以为是知更鸟的,没想到,传说中的蓝鸟主要还是在英国吧?北美知更鸟是这个样子的:
http://www.kanong.net/kano/591
农药查了以后我才发现,原来是这个样子很一般的家伙啊,这边很常见呢。。。
那个blue jay据说就是呱噪的很厉害的一种。。。
Posted by kk











































Posted by kk



















Posted by kk
给各位爱当者看看俺们家小当的新造型
唱:(用东北人都是活雷锋后半段)
俺们内嘎有个小猪当~~~~
俺们猪当喜欢去上街~~~~
俺们猪当背上有挎包~~~~
俺们猪当背包去上街~~~~
or
俺们当当上街去血拼~~~~
俺们当当上街背小包~~~~
俺们当当可爱招人爱~~~~
俺们当当是个帅帅狗~~~~
好吧,当当这个造型是有来源的,具体看这,当当在加拿大新认的干爹的blog,我这只是再演
Posted by kk



















































Posted by kk










晚上住在离公园最近的ruby inn,为了第2天一早方便看日出。因为夜里降温,日出只会更冷,我们几乎武装到了牙齿,才杀去bryce point,5点50左右的日出,我 们5点20多第一个到达的,为了这降魔时刻


































Posted by kk
从今天开始,做一个幸福且快乐的人: 美食美景,读书看片,唱歌摄影,周游世界!
- kk
| 日 | 一 | 二 | 三 | 四 | 五 | 六 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |